When we talk about ethnography, we often talk about what it is going to do for design or marketing communication. What is often unrecognized, (always reality once you’ve done it) is that it is a powerful means of discovery and business immersion for us, the agency, on behalf of our clients - of course in addition to the plethora of design and communication insights that will be garnered.
Yes, as anthropologists, consultants and marketers, it is our job to immerse ourselves in our client’s business. However, there is only so much that can be gained from stakeholder interviews and existing research immersion. I’d suggest that this can get us 80% there. But, it’s that other 20% that can really make business-changing differences.
By actually meeting with current and future customers/users, we get an understanding that gets us closer to an etic (insider) understanding, which can only lend to us being more successful on behalf of our clients. The process of designing, conducting, analyzing, and synthesizing custom research provides a level of insights and empathy that cannot be gained through other means.
Furthermore, there is a clear difference in the caliber of insights, innovation, and design that is produced from people who truly understand the business, the marketplace AND consumers, when compared to those who don’t.
While a 12-week, global ethnographic study need not be necessary, some form of primary, immersive customer research is always worth fighting the good fight for.
6 comments:
what about past customers? Or are they included in the future customers, as future customers that were past customers?
Current customers encompasses past customers - it really means people who are already buying from you, or who have in the past. If they are inactive, then future could include the re-activation of these customers.
Does that make sense?
yes it does... now on to the next point... if the last 20% is what truly informs business decisions, than why even do stakeholder interviews? Why not just talk to customers?
Well the 20% is were you get the really good, innovative, unique stuff. The other 80% is essential for understanding the business and market contexts. None are really good without the rest.
Pardon me, but I believe you have used the wrong word. I think you said etic when you meant to say emic, to explain that you are seeking the insider's perspective. You may want to amend your blog. See the references below (you had me wondering for a moment if I had my wires crossed).
http://faculty.irsc.edu/faculty/jlett/article%20on%20emics%20and%20etics.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emic_and_etic
http://www.brighthub.com/education/languages/articles/5286.aspx
Turkey Ankara Vip Escort Bayanları
ankara escort
Post a Comment